Legal Compliance100/100
Legal compliance is severely compromised by the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. These are fundamental requirements for an open public procurement procedure.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds provided.
•No specific eligibility requirements provided.
Clarity40/100
The tender's description of the requirement and the rationale for not splitting into lots are clear. The PME process is also well-described. However, the overall clarity for bidders is severely hampered by the absence of the full tender documentation and detailed specifications.
•Lack of full tender documentation (e.g., detailed specifications, draft contract) reduces overall clarity for bidders.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of the full tender pack, including detailed technical specifications, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria. The NUTS code is also listed as N/A, which is unusual for a specific council.
•No documents attached or content available for the full tender pack.
•Missing detailed technical specifications for the sensors and associated services.
Fairness60/100
While the Preliminary Market Engagement suggests an effort towards market understanding, the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria fundamentally undermines the fairness and transparency of the tender process. Bidders cannot adequately prepare or understand the basis of selection.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria compromises fairness.
•CPV code 'Software package and information systems' may be too broad or inaccurate for physical air quality sensors and associated services, potentially misdirecting suppliers.
Practicality40/100
The core requirement for air quality monitoring is practical, and the contract duration is reasonable. However, the lack of detailed technical specifications makes it impractical for bidders to formulate precise and compliant proposals. The absence of e-submission is also a practical drawback.
•Lack of detailed technical specifications makes it difficult for bidders to propose precise solutions.
•No e-submission option, which is a practical drawback in modern procurement.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent regarding the number of sensors and the rationale for a single lot. However, the overall lack of comprehensive data (missing documents) prevents a thorough assessment of consistency across all tender elements.
Sustainability25/100
There is a significant missed opportunity to integrate green procurement and social criteria, especially given the environmental focus of the tender. This is a notable weakness in modern public procurement practices.
•No green procurement criteria specified.
•No social criteria specified.