Tenders

Thorntree Court Roof Replacement

Open
Deadline
33 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012248-2026
Value
£1,200,000
Location
East Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,200,000
Duration
6 months
Location
East Midlands
Type
Other
62
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Chesterfield Borough Council require a supplier to complete the replacement of a roof at a flat within the Borough.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (3)
Compliance (3)
Technical (6)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-06T00:00:00.
--Bidders must adhere to the specific submission format and content requirements detailed in the official PDF document.
--Bids must be complete and include all requested information, declarations, and supporting documentation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per public procurement regulations (e.g., bankruptcy, insolvency, grave professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions).
--Bidders must declare that they have not been convicted of certain criminal offenses, including fraud, corruption, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
--Bidders must not have breached environmental, social, or labour law obligations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally constituted and registered to operate in their country of establishment.
--Bidders must possess the legal capacity to enter into a contract with Chesterfield Borough Council.
--Bidders must comply with all applicable laws and regulations relevant to the provision of roof replacement services in the UK.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience in undertaking similar roof replacement projects, specifically for flat roofs.
--Bidders must provide details of qualified personnel who will be assigned to the project, including their experience and certifications relevant to roof works.
--Bidders must demonstrate access to appropriate equipment and resources necessary to complete the roof replacement project within the specified timeframe.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and economic standing sufficient to undertake a project of an estimated value of £1,000,000 (or 1,200,000 EUR).
--Bidders must hold appropriate and valid insurance policies, including Public Liability Insurance and Professional Indemnity Insurance, to cover the scope of works.
--Bidders may be required to provide financial statements or turnover figures for recent financial years.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Planning NoticeHTM
012248-2026.html

Download failed - no summary available

OCDS RecordDOC
012248-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data for a planned procurement notice by Chesterfield Borough Council for roof replacement services.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012248-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about a planned procurement notice from Chesterfield Borough Council for roof replacement works, including details about the contracting authority and the notice's publication on Find a Tender.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012248-2026_official.pdf

Chesterfield Borough Council is seeking a supplier for an open tender to replace a flat roof, with requirements and qualifications detailed within this official PDF document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender documentation provides clear core requirements and essential information, but its quality is significantly diminished by the absence of evaluation criteria and electronic submission capabilities.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no disputes. The AI-extracted requirements indicate compliance with general public procurement regulations. The missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue but does not indicate a major compliance breach.

Missing reveal date
Clarity65/100

The AI-extracted requirements are clear, structured, and understandable. However, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, leaving bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration is present. Requirements are defined, but the lack of evaluation criteria is a critical omission. One tender document also failed to download, potentially limiting full information access.

No evaluation criteria specified
One tender document failed to download
Fairness45/100

The tender value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission significantly undermine the objectivity and transparency of the bidding process, impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission enabled
Practicality55/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a major practical drawback in a modern procurement environment, potentially creating unnecessary administrative burden for bidders.

No e-submission enabled
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure 'Code' are empty but do not affect overall data consistency.

Minor fields (e.g., Liable Person, procedure Code) are empty
Sustainability20/100

The tender documentation shows no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social aspects, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to align with modern sustainable procurement practices.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
Detailed basic information (title, reference, organization, value, duration, CPV)
Value is disclosed, promoting transparency
Procedure type is clearly defined as 'Open' and 'Below threshold - open competition'
Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company

Concerns

Absence of specified evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity and fairness
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission), hindering practicality and equal access
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects
Missing reveal date for the tender
One tender document failed to download, potentially limiting full information access

Recommendations

1. Mandatory: Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness in the bidding process.
2. Strongly Recommended: Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance practicality, accessibility, and efficiency for bidders.
3. Recommended: Consider integrating sustainability, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline