Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly references the Procurement Act 2023 and Procurement Regulations 2024, including the Light Touch Regime, indicating an intention for legal compliance. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, without the full tender documents, it's impossible to verify the complete adherence to all legal requirements.
Clarity40/100
The description of the service, its objectives, and the collaborative approach is clear and well-articulated. The distinction between the two homes regarding property provision is also clear. However, the absence of detailed specifications, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria in the provided content creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant weakness. The tender information explicitly states 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available'. Crucial elements such as detailed service specifications, full terms and conditions, evaluation criteria, and the draft contract are missing, making the tender incomplete for a comprehensive bid preparation.
•Absence of full tender documentation (specifications, evaluation criteria, contract terms)
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100
The highly specialized nature of the service combined with the requirement for the provider to purchase or lease one of the properties could significantly limit the pool of eligible bidders, potentially impacting competition. The lack of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the selection process.
•Potential for limited competition due to property acquisition requirement and specialized service
•Absence of detailed evaluation criteria to ensure fair assessment
Practicality40/100
The service concept addresses a clear and critical social need with a well-defined collaborative model. However, the requirement for the provider to acquire one property (purchase or lease) adds a substantial practical and financial hurdle, which could complicate implementation and narrow the market response.
•Requirement for bidders to purchase or lease one property adds significant practical and financial burden
Data Consistency100/100
The provided basic and financial information is consistent. The description of the two homes and their respective property arrangements is clear and consistent within the given text.
Sustainability25/100
The tender explicitly mentions 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect for social sustainability, focusing on vulnerable children. However, there is no information provided regarding environmental sustainability requirements or broader sustainability considerations.
•Lack of specific environmental sustainability requirements