Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type as 'Open' and correctly assigns the CPV code. It explicitly states compliance with the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023, which is the relevant national legal framework, and clarifies that the Procurement Act 2023 does not apply. The submission period from the current date is reasonable. The main issue is the missing reveal date in the provided metadata.
•Missing reveal date in metadata.
Clarity60/100
The description of the service and the purpose of the procurement is clear and unambiguous. However, the notice frequently refers to the 'full procurement documentation' for critical details such as mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed service requirements, financial requirements, and, most notably, evaluation criteria. The absence of evaluation criteria in this notice significantly reduces its clarity for potential bidders.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified in the notice.
•Detailed requirements (exclusion grounds, financial, service specifics) are only referenced as being in full documentation.
Completeness65/100
The tender provides all basic information including title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. Location information and CPV codes are also present. However, the full tender documentation, which would contain detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, is not directly attached or summarized beyond administrative documents, requiring access to an external portal.
•Full tender documentation (detailed requirements, evaluation criteria) is not directly provided, only referenced as being on an external portal.
Fairness60/100
The tender supports e-procurement via a free-to-register portal, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting equal access and transparency. The requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria in the notice significantly undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot fully understand the basis of assessment without accessing external documents.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified, impacting transparency and fairness.
Practicality85/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the Atamis e-sourcing portal, with a direct URL and helpdesk contact provided. The contract duration (120 months) and an implied start date ('mobilisation is due to start in June 2026') are specified. Financing information (estimated value, UDA rates in full docs) is adequately presented for a notice.
Data Consistency70/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (EUR in basic info vs. GBP in description) and a slight numerical difference. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is inconsistent with the actual disclosure of the value. The automated check's 'No e-submission' flag contradicts the tender's explicit 'E-Procurement' characteristic and submission instructions.
•Inconsistency in estimated value currency (EUR vs. GBP) and slight numerical difference.
•'Value Classified: Yes' flag is inconsistent with the disclosed value.
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects beyond the core service delivery (addressing limited dental access), or innovation focus. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects beyond core service delivery.