Tenders

Highways Operatives Training Brokerage Service

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012749-2026
Value
£325,000
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£325,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Other
59
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Bedford Borough Council requires a competent and experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate, procure, and deliver a comprehensive programme of highways-related training for approximately 40 operatives, inspectors, and supervisory staff. Maximum training distance is 30 miles from the Council building.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-09T12:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements (e.g., legal entity status, registrations) are explicitly stated in the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Be a competent Training Brokerage Service Provider.
--Be an experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider.
--Ability to coordinate highways-related training.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial standing) are explicitly stated in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
012749-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about Bedford Borough Council's tender for a Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate and deliver highways-related training for approximately 40 staff within a 30-mile radius.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012749-2026_ocds_release.json

Bedford Borough Council seeks a competent and experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate and deliver comprehensive highways-related training for approximately 40 staff within 30 miles of the Council building.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012749-2026_official.pdf

Bedford Borough Council seeks an experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate and deliver comprehensive highways-related training for approximately 40 staff, with training limited to 30 miles from the Council building.

Tender NoticeHTM
012749-2026.html

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

59
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides clear basic information and service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness due to missing evaluation criteria and inaccessible key documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes correctly, with no disputes. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements, which are fundamental legal components. The failure to access the 'Tender Notice' document further compounds this issue.

No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated
No explicit eligibility requirements stated
Clarity55/100

The service description and technical capability requirements are clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of explicit legal and financial requirements also reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements
Completeness60/100

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and location is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the failure to access the 'Tender Notice' document and the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and all evaluation criteria.

Tender Notice document content unavailable
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness50/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and technical requirements appear generic. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making fair assessment challenging. The lack of e-submission and the inaccessible 'Tender Notice' also hinder equal access to information and participation.

No evaluation criteria specified (major transparency issue)
No e-submission support
Practicality60/100

The contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a practical drawback for bidders. The inability to access a key tender document also presents a practical hurdle.

No e-submission support
Tender Notice document content unavailable
Data Consistency80/100

Key dates are logical and consistent, and the tender status is active with no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the procedure type.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing codes for Type and Procedure
Sustainability20/100

This tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, representing a missed opportunity to incorporate modern sustainability standards into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects included

Strengths

Clear service description and technical requirements
Basic tender information (value, duration, dates) is provided
Correct CPV code and open procedure type

Concerns

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements
Inability to access the 'Tender Notice' document
Lack of e-submission support
No sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Ensure all mandatory legal, eligibility, and financial requirements are explicitly stated and accessible.
3. Enable electronic submission to improve accessibility and efficiency for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline