Tenders

Demolition Engineering consultancy Services

Open
Deadline
10 days left
March 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012189-2026
Value
£4,000,000
Location
West Central Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 13, 2026

Budget
£4,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
West Central Scotland
Type
Other
72
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

North Lanarkshire Council are seeking contract with a suitably qualified and experienced Demolition Engineering Consultancy organisation

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission deadline is 2026-03-13T12:00:00+00:00.
--Must meet mandatory community benefit requirements, achieving a minimum of 100 points across recruitment and training.
--Must provide information for qualification sections that will be subject to pass/fail scoring.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be a suitably qualified Demolition Engineering Consultancy organisation.
--Must be an experienced Demolition Engineering Consultancy organisation.
--Must comply with contractual terms based on NEC 4.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must demonstrate qualification as a Demolition Engineering Consultancy.
--Must demonstrate experience as a Demolition Engineering Consultancy.
--Must be capable of providing services for a phase 2 demolition programme covering twelve high-rise residential properties.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
012189-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record details the tender's contractual terms, including NEC 4 and Scots Law, outlines the pass/fail scoring for qualification sections, and specifies mandatory community benefit requirements with a minimum of 100 points across recruitment and training.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012189-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data about the North Lanarkshire Council's tender for Demolition Engineering Consultancy services, offering transparency and detailed procurement information.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012189-2026_official.pdf

North Lanarkshire Council is seeking a qualified and experienced Demolition Engineering Consultancy for a phase 2 demolition programme covering twelve high-rise residential properties.

Tender NoticeHTM
012189-2026.html

North Lanarkshire Council is seeking a qualified Demolition Engineering Consultancy for services, with full tender documents available electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Demolition Engineering Consultancy Services demonstrates good foundational elements with clear requirements and a focus on social benefits, but suffers from incomplete evaluation criteria and minor data gaps.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and states compliance with Scots Law and NEC 4. The 31-day submission period is reasonable. However, the reveal date is missing, and the AI summary notes that mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly mentioned, which could be a concern if not detailed in the full documents.

Missing reveal date
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned in AI summary
Clarity70/100

The description of services and key requirements (qualification, experience, legal frameworks) is clear. However, the overall evaluation criteria are not fully specified in the provided summary, particularly regarding financial aspects, which is also flagged by the automated check.

Incomplete specification of evaluation criteria, especially financial aspects
Completeness70/100

Basic information, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. All listed documents are available. However, the reveal date is missing, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the full scope of evaluation criteria is not detailed in the summary.

Missing reveal date
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Fairness80/100

Full document access is indicated, the value is disclosed, and e-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic. While some evaluation criteria (pass/fail, community benefit points) are objective, the lack of a comprehensive breakdown of all evaluation criteria in the summary reduces overall transparency.

Incomplete evaluation criteria in summary affecting transparency
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies 'E-Procurement' and a clear contract duration. However, an explicit document URL is not provided in the summary, and the contract start date is unknown. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and the automated check's 'No e-submission' is a concern for practical implementation.

No explicit document URL provided in summary
Contract start date not known
Data Consistency80/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. There are no disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, the reveal date is missing, and there's a contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing reveal date
Sustainability55/100

The tender includes a strong social aspect through mandatory community benefit requirements (recruitment and training). However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or innovation focus.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
No innovation focus

Strengths

Clear description of services and requirements
Explicit inclusion of mandatory community benefit requirements
Use of E-Procurement and OCDS data for transparency
Value and contract duration are clearly specified
Compliance with national legal frameworks (Scots Law, NEC 4)

Concerns

Incomplete specification of evaluation criteria, particularly financial aspects
Missing reveal date and empty 'Liable Person' field
Lack of explicit green procurement or innovation focus
Contradiction regarding e-submission between characteristics and automated check
Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the AI summary (though likely in full documents)

Recommendations

1. Provide a comprehensive breakdown of all evaluation criteria, including weighting for technical and financial aspects.
2. Ensure all administrative fields, such as the reveal date and liable person, are fully populated.
3. Integrate environmental considerations and encourage innovative solutions within the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline