For the Provision of a Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) Tool

This tender provides clear basic information and requirements for a PPM tool but suffers from significant gaps in completeness and fairness, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria and lack of e-submission. While the description is clear, the process itself lacks transparency and modern practical features.

The tender generally complies with basic legal requirements; the procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no disputes. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds in the AI-extracted requirements is a minor legal oversight.

The description of the required PPM tool and its functional requirements are clear and understandable. The absence of evaluation criteria is more a completeness/fairness issue than a lack of clarity in the existing text.

While basic information is present, critical details such as evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements for bidders, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are missing, which significantly impacts the tender's completeness.

The absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission significantly undermine the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. While experience with Housing Associations is noted as an advantage, it is explicitly stated as 'not essential', mitigating tailoring concerns.

The lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Other practical information, such as contract start date and duration, is available.

The data is generally consistent across the provided fields. A minor inconsistency exists between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed 'Estimated Value: 81,600.00 EUR', but the value is ultimately provided.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are increasingly important considerations in public procurement.