Acquisition of play furniture for the needs of Liepāja preschool educational institution “Kriksītis”

This tender for play furniture is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an open procedure, but potential restricted document access raises significant concerns regarding fairness and completeness for bidders.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, uses appropriate CPV codes, and provides reasonable deadlines. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if true for bidders, poses a potential compliance risk regarding transparency, but the content itself appears compliant.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across the Nolikums, technical specifications, and forms. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly specified, contradicting the automated check. Performance conditions are clearly linked to the technical specification and draft contract.

All essential information such as title, organization, reference, value, deadlines, and location is provided. Key documents like regulations, forms, technical specifications, and a draft contract are listed and summarized. The 'Restricted document access' flag, however, raises concerns about the practical completeness for bidders.

The tender benefits from a disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern, potentially hindering fair competition if all necessary documents are not readily available to all bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. Contract duration is specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag could create practical hurdles for bidders. A direct, easily accessible URL for all documents would improve practicality further.

The tender information is largely consistent across all provided fields, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. The contradictions noted by the automated check (e.g., regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria) appear to be misinterpretations of the tender's explicit characteristics and document content.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is a standard procurement without specific sustainability criteria, which is a missed opportunity given the nature of the goods (furniture for a preschool).