Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly states it is a Request for Information (PME) and not a call for competition, which is legally sound for pre-market engagement. CPV codes are appropriate. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being 'None' are formal omissions, even for a PME.
•Formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated.
Clarity80/100
The description of the PME's purpose, the required Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) units, and the process for providing feedback are exceptionally clear. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the tender's content.
Completeness70/100
Most essential information for a PME, including title, organization, reference, estimated value, and timeline for potential future contract, is provided. The requirements for market feedback are well-defined. However, the formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are missing.
•Formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated.
Fairness85/100
As a PME, the process appears fair and open, inviting broad market feedback. The requirements for BNG units are specific to the project but not tailored to a single company. Full document access and value disclosure contribute to transparency.
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission for the PME is supported via a Microsoft Forms link, which is functional. Information on the future e-procurement system (Defra eCommercial System) is provided, enhancing practicality for subsequent stages. Contract start and duration are known.
•PME submission relies on a generic Microsoft Forms link rather than an integrated e-procurement module.
Data Consistency90/100
The information provided across the basic details, description, and AI-extracted requirements is highly consistent. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions.
•Formal 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated, creating a minor data gap.
Sustainability80/100
The core subject of this PME is Biodiversity Net Gain, making it inherently a green procurement initiative focused on environmental sustainability. This is a significant strength, despite the notice not explicitly detailing additional social or innovation criteria.
•Lack of explicit mention of broader social aspects or innovation focus beyond the core BNG objective.