Skip to main content
Tenders

2032-OJEU-DPS - Adaptations for Independent Living

Open
Deadline
1614 days left
August 27, 2030
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
011472-2023
Value
£20,000,000
Location
East of England, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

April 21, 2023

Deadline for Questions

August 20, 2030

Submission Deadline

August 27, 2030

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£20,000,000
Duration
120 months
Location
East of England
Type
Restricted Procedure
68
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

East Suffolk has established an agency to offer advice and support to all those living with a disability to enable them to live safely and independently at home. In most cases the agency will help residents to apply for grant funding to adapt their homes.This DPS is to establish a list of contractors able to deliver those adaptations.This notice is republished since the move from procurement portals. Original notice here, dated 28/08/2020:https://www.delta-esourcing.com/delta/respondToList.html?accessCode=28GCE3MBR5

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted through the designated e-sourcing portal.
--The submission deadline for initial applications to the DPS is 2030-08-27 11:00:00.
--Bidders must refer to the full procurement documents on the e-sourcing portal for detailed instructions on the application process, required forms, and documentation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as stipulated by relevant public procurement regulations. Full details will be provided in the procurement documents on the e-sourcing portal.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally established entities capable of performing "Construction work for houses" and "Adaptations for Independent Living."
--Bidders must access and respond to the full procurement documents via the East Suffolk Council's e-sourcing portal: `https://www.delta-esourcing.com/delta/respondToList.html?accessCode=28GCE3MBR5`.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to deliver "Adaptations for Independent Living" services, enabling individuals with disabilities to live safely and independently at home.
--Bidders must be able to perform construction work related to house adaptations.
--Specific technical qualifications, experience, and resources will be detailed in the full procurement documents on the e-sourcing portal.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to undertake contracts within a Dynamic Purchasing System with an estimated total value of £20,000,000.0 EUR over a 120-month period.
--Specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance) will be detailed in the full procurement documents on the e-sourcing portal.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
011472-2023_official.pdf

This is a contract notice from East Suffolk Council for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) to establish a list of contractors for home adaptations for independent living, with an estimated value of £20 million, directing interested parties to the e-sourcing portal for full procurement documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for home adaptations for disabled individuals. While the basic information is present, the complete lack of accessible procurement documents and detailed criteria raises significant concerns about transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender refers to mandatory exclusion grounds and relevant public procurement regulations, which is standard. However, the stated 'Restricted procedure' contradicts the nature of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), which is typically an open procedure. The absence of full procurement documents makes it impossible to verify compliance with detailed legal requirements.

Contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS).
Inability to verify full legal compliance due to missing documents.
Clarity40/100

The high-level description and extracted requirements are generally clear in their intent. However, critical details for eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are deferred to inaccessible 'full procurement documents,' leading to a significant lack of practical clarity for potential bidders.

Lack of specific details for eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Reliance on inaccessible 'full procurement documents' for crucial information.
Completeness83/100

The tender is severely incomplete as no actual procurement documents are attached or directly accessible from the provided information. All crucial details, including specific evaluation criteria and detailed application instructions, are stated to be on an external portal without direct access.

No procurement documents attached or directly accessible.
Missing specific evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100

The lack of accessible full procurement documents and specific criteria creates a significant barrier to fair competition. Potential bidders cannot adequately assess the opportunity or prepare a compliant submission without these details, potentially disadvantaging those without prior knowledge or direct access to the portal. The general nature of the requirements does not immediately suggest tailoring, but the absence of detail prevents a thorough assessment.

Lack of transparency due to inaccessible full documents.
Potential for unfair competition due to missing detailed criteria.
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is highly impractical as it provides insufficient information to even begin preparing a response. All essential details are externalized to an e-sourcing portal, and the provided link is for responding, not for direct document access.

Bidders cannot prepare a response without accessing external, currently unavailable, full documents.
The provided link is for responding, not for direct document download or general portal access.
Data Consistency100/100

There is a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Type: Restricted' and 'Procedure: Restricted procedure' and the description of establishing a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'. A DPS is an open procedure, which contradicts a restricted procedure. Additionally, the financial requirements mix currency symbols, stating '£20,000,000.0 EUR'.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System'.
Currency inconsistency (£ and EUR mixed in financial requirements).
Sustainability25/100

The tender explicitly lists 'Social Criteria' under procurement characteristics, which is a positive indicator for sustainability. However, without the full documents, it's impossible to assess the depth or enforceability of these criteria. There is no explicit mention of environmental or innovation aspects.

Lack of detail on the specific 'Social Criteria'.
No explicit mention of environmental or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear objective to support independent living for disabled individuals.
Addresses a significant social need through 'Social Criteria'.
Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for long-term flexibility.
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly stated.
References mandatory exclusion grounds.

Concerns

Complete absence of accessible procurement documents.
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, and financial criteria.
Contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System'.
Inconsistency in currency notation (£ and EUR).
Reliance on an external portal without direct document access for analysis.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish or provide direct links to all full procurement documents.
2. Clarify the procurement procedure (Restricted vs. DPS) and ensure consistency in terminology.
3. Provide specific, measurable criteria for eligibility, technical capability, and financial capacity within the main tender notice or easily accessible documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline