United Kingdom3 days leftOpen

Insolvency Practitioner (IP) Panel

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 05, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

66171000

REFERENCE

002611-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The FCA seeks to establish a four-year panel of consulting and restructuring firms to provide Insolvency Practitioners (IPs) for court appointments over authorised firms, replacement of IPs, or candidate suggestions. This is not a a Procurement Act 2023 procurement. The panel aims to ensure skilled IPs are available for authorised firm insolvencies. No contracts or payments from FCA funds will be made to panel firms. Bidders must register on FCA's eProcurement system (Atamis) to respond to the RFP.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • None explicitly stated in the provided tender information, as this procurement is not subject to the Procurement Act 2023.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a consulting and restructuring firm.
  • Be capable of providing Insolvency Practitioners (IPs).
  • Ensure IPs possess the requisite skills and experience for appointments related to authorised firm insolvency.
  • Register on the FCA's eProcurement system (Atamis) at https://atamis-fca.my.site.com/s/Welcome.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate the ability to provide Insolvency Practitioners.
  • Ensure provided IPs have the necessary skills and experience to be appointed in the event of an authorised firm's insolvency.
  • Possess the operational capacity and expertise to take on such appointments.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements for bidders are explicitly stated in the provided tender information. There will be no payments from FCA funds to panel firms.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Register on the FCA's eProcurement system (Atamis) at https://atamis-fca.my.site.com/s/Welcome.
  • Respond to the Request for Proposal (RFP) through the Atamis system.
  • Refer to the Atamis Supplier User Guide (https://services.atamis.co.uk/docs/Supplier_User_Guide.pdf) for guidance on using the system.
  • Submit the response by the deadline: 2026-02-05 12:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002611-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking to establish a four-year panel of consulting and restructuring firms to provide Insolvency Practitioners for appointments related to the insolvency of authorised firms, with no direct contracts or payments from FCA funds.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender aims to establish a panel of Insolvency Practitioner firms for the FCA, notably operating outside the Procurement Act 2023 and involving no direct payments from FCA funds. The complete absence of detailed documentation and evaluation criteria presents significant challenges for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender explicitly states it is not subject to the Procurement Act 2023, which explains the absence of standard mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed procurement procedures. However, even for below-threshold or non-regulated procurements, principles of transparency and equal treatment are generally expected. The lack of detailed documentation makes it difficult to fully assess compliance with internal FCA policies or general good practice.

No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided, which, while stated as not applicable under the Act, could still be beneficial for transparency.
Clarity40/100

The overall purpose of establishing an IP panel is clear. However, the specific expectations for firms, the selection process, and the criteria for IP suitability are not sufficiently detailed in the provided extract. The 'no payments from FCA funds' is clear but raises questions about the financial model for panel firms.

Lack of detailed selection/evaluation criteria.
Ambiguity regarding how panel firms will be compensated (if not by FCA) and the nature of future appointments.
Completeness75/100

This is the weakest area. The tender information is severely lacking in detail. The complete absence of any attached documents (RFP, terms of reference, evaluation methodology, etc.) means critical information for bidders is missing.

No documents attached (e.g., RFP, terms of reference, evaluation methodology).
Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Fairness40/100

The open competition type suggests an intent for fairness. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and specific requirements could lead to an opaque selection process, potentially hindering fair competition. Without clear criteria, the FCA's discretion in selecting panel members or IPs could be perceived as subjective.

Absence of clear, objective evaluation criteria.
Potential for subjective assessment due to lack of detailed requirements.
Practicality40/100

The use of an eProcurement system (Atamis) is practical for submission. However, the lack of comprehensive information makes it impractical for bidders to prepare a high-quality, compliant response. Firms are asked to demonstrate capability without clear benchmarks.

Bidders cannot adequately prepare without detailed RFP documents and evaluation criteria.
The 'no payments from FCA funds' model needs further clarification for firms to assess the commercial viability of joining the panel.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided information is internally consistent. The statement about not being subject to the Procurement Act 2023 aligns with the absence of certain standard procurement elements.

Sustainability0/100

No sustainability (environmental, social, ethical) criteria are mentioned. This is common for service tenders of this nature but represents a missed opportunity for the FCA to integrate broader public value considerations.

No green procurement or social criteria specified.

Strengths

Clear purpose and organizational context.
Utilizes a dedicated eProcurement system for submissions.
Open competition procedure.
Explicitly states non-applicability of Procurement Act 2023, clarifying the legal framework.

Concerns

Critical: Complete absence of attached tender documents (RFP, terms of reference, evaluation criteria).
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for panel selection.
Ambiguity regarding the financial model for panel firms, given 'no payments from FCA funds'.
Insufficient detail on specific IP qualifications, experience, and operational capacity requirements.
Potential for subjective assessment due to lack of clear benchmarks.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive tender documents, including the full Request for Proposal (RFP), detailed terms of reference, and explicit evaluation criteria.
2. Clearly articulate the financial model for panel firms, explaining how IPs will be compensated for their services.
3. Provide specific, measurable requirements for IP qualifications, experience, and firm operational capacity to ensure objective assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
63/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes