Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly references the Public Contracts Regulations 2015/102 and mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating a commitment to legal compliance. However, the classification as 'Restricted' for a DPS, which typically allows open admission, could cause minor confusion.
Clarity40/100
The purpose of the amendment (DPS extension) and the scope of eligible public bodies are clear. However, the overall clarity of the tender is diminished by the heavy reliance on external links and the original 2018 notice for all substantive details and requirements.
Completeness83/100
This notice is notably incomplete as a standalone document, lacking any attached tender documents or detailed specifications. Bidders are directed to an external platform and a historical notice for essential information, which is a significant drawback.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure inherently promotes fairness by allowing continuous supplier admission. The broad range of public sector bodies eligible to use the DPS also supports fair market access. No evidence suggests tailoring for a specific company.
Practicality40/100
The use of a dedicated online platform (Panacea) for managing the DPS and submissions is practical for a system of this nature. The general requirements are also practical for the service type.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within this amendment notice is consistent.
Sustainability25/100
The inclusion of 'Social Criteria' is a positive aspect, indicating consideration beyond purely economic factors. However, there is no explicit mention of environmental or innovation criteria.