Legal Compliance100/100
Legal compliance is questionable due to the complete absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and the lack of comprehensive tender documents, which are fundamental for a legally sound procurement process.
•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Lack of comprehensive tender documents (0 documents attached).
Clarity40/100
Clarity is very poor. Without any tender documents, bidders lack essential information. Key requirements like 'relevant regulatory framework' and 'strong presence in their areas of operation' are vague, and the geographical scope (NUTS code) is missing.
•No tender documents available.
•Vague eligibility and technical requirements (e.g., 'relevant regulatory framework', 'strong presence').
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any attached documents means crucial information such as full specifications, terms and conditions, application forms, and detailed evaluation criteria is entirely missing.
•Zero documents attached, rendering the tender fundamentally incomplete.
•Absence of specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance).
Fairness80/100
While the DPS structure inherently promotes market access and fairness by allowing continuous entry, the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria compromises fair competition. Bidders cannot adequately understand how their applications will be assessed.
•Lack of clear and detailed evaluation criteria for technical and qualitative requirements.
•Absence of comprehensive tender documents hinders equal understanding for all potential bidders.
Practicality40/100
The tender is highly impractical for potential bidders. Without any supporting documents, it is impossible to prepare a compliant, comprehensive, and competitive application.
•Impossibility for bidders to prepare an application without any tender documents or detailed instructions.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent, with the description aligning with the stated characteristics and technical requirements. The automated check's 'Not green procurement' flag contradicts the tender's explicit mention of reducing environmental impact.
•Automated check's 'Not green procurement' flag contradicts the tender's explicit commitment to reducing environmental impact.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly incorporates sustainability and social value objectives in its description and technical requirements, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of detailed criteria makes it difficult to assess how these will be measured and enforced.
•Lack of specific, measurable criteria for assessing commitments to reducing environmental impact and adding social value.