Tenders

Residential and Nursing Care DPS (Dynamic Purchasing System)

Open
Deadline
2615 days left
April 30, 2033
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
007870-2023
Value
£293,000,000
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2023

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2033

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2033

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£293,000,000
Duration
124 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Other
73
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council has successfully improved outcomes for residents by embedding strengths-based approaches.The new Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) will provide a solid foundation to deliver improvements and innovation including working towards the integration of health and social care at the locality level, maximising the use of technology enabled living to improve health and wellbeing, increased efficiency, and a reduction of the environmental impact of service delivery and adding social value.The Council wishes to work with provider partners who will establish a strong presence in their areas of operation and work strategically and collaboratively with stakeholders and each other to improve the outcomes for people.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit applications by the deadline: 2033-04-30 22:59:00.
--Adhere to the application process for an Open Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Be a provider capable of delivering Residential and Nursing Care services.
--Be legally established and qualified to operate within the relevant regulatory framework for residential and nursing care.
--Be able to apply to join an Open Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Demonstrate the ability to embed strengths-based approaches in service delivery.
--Demonstrate capability to work towards the integration of health and social care at the locality level.
--Demonstrate capability to maximize the use of technology enabled living to improve health and wellbeing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
007870-2023_official.pdf

This document is a formal contract notice from West Northamptonshire Council announcing an Open Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Residential and Nursing Care services, valued at £293 million, aiming to integrate health and social care, improve outcomes, and reduce environmental impact.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System with commendable strategic objectives for residential and nursing care, but its quality is severely undermined by the complete absence of tender documents and critical detailed requirements.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Legal compliance is questionable due to the complete absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and the lack of comprehensive tender documents, which are fundamental for a legally sound procurement process.

Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Lack of comprehensive tender documents (0 documents attached).
Clarity40/100

Clarity is very poor. Without any tender documents, bidders lack essential information. Key requirements like 'relevant regulatory framework' and 'strong presence in their areas of operation' are vague, and the geographical scope (NUTS code) is missing.

No tender documents available.
Vague eligibility and technical requirements (e.g., 'relevant regulatory framework', 'strong presence').
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any attached documents means crucial information such as full specifications, terms and conditions, application forms, and detailed evaluation criteria is entirely missing.

Zero documents attached, rendering the tender fundamentally incomplete.
Absence of specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance).
Fairness80/100

While the DPS structure inherently promotes market access and fairness by allowing continuous entry, the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria compromises fair competition. Bidders cannot adequately understand how their applications will be assessed.

Lack of clear and detailed evaluation criteria for technical and qualitative requirements.
Absence of comprehensive tender documents hinders equal understanding for all potential bidders.
Practicality40/100

The tender is highly impractical for potential bidders. Without any supporting documents, it is impossible to prepare a compliant, comprehensive, and competitive application.

Impossibility for bidders to prepare an application without any tender documents or detailed instructions.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided information is internally consistent, with the description aligning with the stated characteristics and technical requirements. The automated check's 'Not green procurement' flag contradicts the tender's explicit mention of reducing environmental impact.

Automated check's 'Not green procurement' flag contradicts the tender's explicit commitment to reducing environmental impact.
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly incorporates sustainability and social value objectives in its description and technical requirements, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of detailed criteria makes it difficult to assess how these will be measured and enforced.

Lack of specific, measurable criteria for assessing commitments to reducing environmental impact and adding social value.

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for continuous market access and flexibility.
Clear strategic objectives focusing on innovation, integration of health and social care, and technology-enabled living.
Explicit inclusion of social criteria and commitment to reducing environmental impact and adding social value.
Long contract duration (124 months) and high estimated value provide stability and attract significant providers.

Concerns

Critical absence of any tender documents, making the procurement process unworkable.
Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, a fundamental legal requirement.
Lack of specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance) for a high-value contract.
Absence of clear evaluation criteria for technical and qualitative requirements.
Vague geographical scope and requirements (e.g., 'strong presence', 'areas of operation').

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including full specifications, terms and conditions, and application forms.
2. Clearly detail all mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and specific evaluation criteria for all technical capabilities.
3. Clarify the geographical scope of the service delivery, potentially by specifying NUTS codes or defined localities.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline