Acquisition of stage lighting equipment for LNSO

This tender for stage lighting equipment is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but faces significant concerns regarding restricted document access and the non-disclosure of the estimated value.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a serious concern for legal compliance, hindering transparency and equal treatment. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also impacts transparency.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements, supported by document summaries, indicate well-defined technical, financial, and submission requirements. Evaluation criteria, including price and energy efficiency for economic advantageousness, are specified.

Most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, duration, detailed requirements, and templates, is present. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value is a significant gap in completeness.

While evaluation criteria are objective and e-procurement is enabled, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw that severely compromises fairness. The non-disclosure of the estimated value further reduces transparency and equal opportunity for bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag, if it implies difficulty in obtaining necessary documents, significantly impacts practicality. The absence of specific financing information beyond the undisclosed value is also a minor drawback.

The dates provided are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. Most key fields are populated, although the estimated value is missing. The 'Restricted document access' is a consistently reported issue across multiple checks.

The inclusion of energy efficiency as an evaluation criterion is a positive aspect for green procurement. However, the tender lacks broader sustainability considerations such as social aspects or innovation focus, and it is not EU funded.