Supply of Medical Equipment for Operating Theatre

This tender for medical equipment supply is an open procedure utilizing e-procurement and divided into parts, yet restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value significantly reduce transparency and fairness.

The tender follows an open procedure with a reasonable submission deadline and appropriate CPV codes. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the undisclosed estimated value are significant transparency issues that may not fully comply with best practices or certain legal disclosure requirements.

The AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear and detailed, covering all necessary aspects for both parts of the procurement. Evaluation criteria, based on the lowest price for each part, are explicitly stated, ensuring transparency in assessment.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and detailed requirements are well-provided. However, the critical omission of the estimated value significantly impacts the tender's completeness. The 'Restricted document access' also implies potential gaps in readily available information.

The 'Restricted document access' and 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' are critical fairness issues. These create barriers to entry and reduce transparency, making it difficult for all potential bidders to compete on an equal footing, despite the use of e-procurement and objective evaluation criteria.

The tender benefits from supporting e-procurement, which enhances practicality for bidders. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and the estimated value makes financial and operational planning more challenging for potential suppliers.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. The primary data gap is the missing estimated value. Contradictions from automated checks regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria are resolved by prioritizing the detailed content summaries.

The tender does not include any explicit elements of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.