Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines itself as a pre-market engagement, not a call for competition, and references the relevant Procurement Act 2023. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being 'None' is a formal gap but understandable for a PME.
•Type and Procedure fields are 'None'
Clarity80/100
The description of the Mental Health Crisis Housing service is clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope and approach. AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. The absence of formal evaluation criteria is noted but less critical for a PME.
•No formal evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location (NUTS code), is provided. However, one document failed to provide a summary, and formal evaluation criteria are missing. The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are also not fully populated.
•One document failed to download/summarize
•No formal evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. While formal evaluation criteria and e-submission are absent, these are less critical for a pre-market engagement stage focused on market understanding rather than competitive award.
•No formal evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission option mentioned
Practicality65/100
Key practical information such as contract start date, duration, and estimated value are provided. However, the lack of an explicit e-submission option is a practical drawback in modern procurement, even for a PME.
•No e-submission option mentioned
Data Consistency90/100
The data provided is largely consistent and logical, with dates making sense in relation to the current date and future contract. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor empty fields like 'Liable Person' are noted but do not significantly impact consistency.
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability50/100
While the core service itself addresses a significant social need, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate broader sustainability aspects such as green procurement criteria, additional social clauses for the provider, or an innovation focus.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No additional social criteria beyond the core service