Environmental accessibility expert services during project implementation

This tender documentation is clear on basic information and EU funding, but it presents significant shortcomings regarding document accessibility and the clarity of evaluation criteria.

The tender defines a clear procedure and offers a reasonable submission deadline. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for legal compliance, as it hinders transparency and equal treatment.

The general description of services is clear. Nevertheless, the conflicting information regarding the presence of evaluation criteria and the high-level nature of AI-extracted requirements reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are complete. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the flagged 'Missing evaluation criteria' mean that essential components for a comprehensive bid are not fully available or defined.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, preventing equal access to information. The 'Missing evaluation criteria' also compromises transparency and objectivity, which are fundamental to a fair procurement process.

While 'E-Procurement' is indicated and duration/financing are clear, the 'Restricted document access' significantly impedes practical preparation for bidders. The contract start date is also not explicitly provided.

Most key fields are populated and dates are logical. However, there are notable contradictions, such as 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic while 'No e-submission' is flagged, and conflicting information on evaluation criteria.

The tender's subject matter ('Environmental accessibility expert services') and EU funding for nature conservation inherently align with green procurement. However, no explicit additional social or innovation criteria are mentioned.