Legal Compliance100/100
The tender outlines a below-threshold open competition, which is appropriate. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria raises concerns regarding full legal compliance and transparency.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Absence of detailed selection and award criteria
Clarity40/100
The description clearly defines the scope of work, service frequencies, and key responsibilities. However, the overall clarity of the procurement process is hampered by the requirement to register on a portal to access full documents.
•Full tender documents not publicly accessible without registration
Completeness83/100
The provided information is a high-level summary. Critical components such as full tender documents, detailed selection and award criteria, and specific financial requirements are missing from the publicly available description.
•No full tender documents available
•Missing detailed selection criteria
Fairness60/100
The open competition type promotes fairness. However, the necessity to register to view full documents and the absence of clear evaluation criteria could disadvantage potential bidders by limiting their ability to make an informed decision to participate.
•Requirement to register for full documents creates a barrier
•Lack of clear evaluation criteria impacts fairness
Practicality40/100
The use of an e-procurement portal is practical for submission. The specified service requirements (e.g., response times, servicing frequencies) are standard and practical for lift maintenance.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided description and extracted requirements are consistent with each other.
Sustainability0/100
The tender mentions a commitment to sustainability, which is positive. However, without specific requirements or evaluation criteria, its practical implementation and assessment remain unclear.
•Lack of specific sustainability requirements or evaluation criteria