Tenders

Stock Condition Survey

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
009312-2026
Value
£455,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 06, 2026

Budget
£455,000
Duration
24 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
41
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

CVHA requires a suitably qualified and experienced consultant to undertake stock condition surveys within our domestic and non-domestic properties, in order to assess the current condition and inform future investment strategies

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-06T12:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly mentioned in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Be a suitably qualified consultant.
--Be an experienced consultant.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to undertake stock condition surveys within domestic properties.
--Ability to undertake stock condition surveys within non-domestic properties.
--Ability to assess the current condition of properties.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial standing) for bidders are explicitly mentioned in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
009312-2026_ocds_record.json

Clyde Valley Housing Association seeks a qualified and experienced consultant to conduct stock condition surveys on domestic and non-domestic properties to assess current condition and inform future investment strategies.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
009312-2026_ocds_release.json

Clyde Valley Housing Association seeks a qualified and experienced consultant to conduct stock condition surveys on their properties to assess current condition and guide future investment strategies.

Official PDF VersionPDF
009312-2026_official.pdf

Clyde Valley Housing Association seeks a suitably qualified and experienced consultant to conduct stock condition surveys on its domestic and non-domestic properties to inform future investment strategies.

Tender NoticeHTM
009312-2026.html

Clyde Valley Housing Association seeks suitably qualified consultants to undertake stock condition surveys within their domestic and non-domestic properties to assess current condition and inform future investment strategies.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

41
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, primarily due to the absence of critical evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, which severely impacts fairness and legal compliance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance40/100

The tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance. Most critically, the absence of any specified evaluation criteria is a major legal and procedural flaw.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing specific financial requirements
Clarity35/100

While the service description is clear, the eligibility and technical requirements are extremely generic and lack specific, measurable criteria. The complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to significant ambiguity.

Eligibility and technical requirements are too generic
No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness40/100

Basic information like title, reference, value, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the lack of detailed specifications, specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria. The provided documents appear to be basic notices rather than comprehensive tender specifications.

Missing detailed tender specifications
Missing specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Fairness30/100

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as it introduces subjectivity into the assessment process and prevents transparent competition. The generic requirements further contribute to potential arbitrary decision-making. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises concerns about equal access.

No evaluation criteria specified (critical for fairness)
Requirements are too generic, leading to potential subjectivity
Practicality50/100

The contract duration and start date are clearly specified. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged is a significant practical concern, potentially hindering efficient bid submission. Assuming documents are accessible online.

Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding e-submission ('E-Procurement' characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag). Minor missing procedure codes are noted.

Inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag
Sustainability25/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement aspects
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description
Estimated value and duration are disclosed
CPV code is correctly assigned
Indication of 'Divided into Parts' for potential SME access

Concerns

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements
No evaluation criteria specified, severely impacting transparency and fairness
Eligibility and technical requirements are too generic
Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Provide specific, measurable eligibility, financial, and technical requirements to reduce ambiguity.
3. Clarify mandatory exclusion grounds and confirm the exact e-submission functionality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline