UEC Middle House Refurbishment (Works)

This tender for refurbishment works is moderately structured with good basic information, but suffers from significant clarity and completeness issues due to missing evaluation criteria and a lack of detailed requirements in the provided summary. Sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

The tender generally appears compliant for a below-threshold procedure, with a defined type and appropriate CPV code. However, the 'Liable Person' is missing, procedure codes are not fully populated, and the reveal date is absent, indicating minor disclosure gaps. The AI summary also notes that specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed, requiring bidders to consult the full pack.

While the project description is clear, the AI-extracted requirements frequently defer to the full tender pack for specifics, indicating a lack of detailed information in the provided summary. Critically, the tender explicitly flags 'No evaluation criteria specified,' which is a major deficiency, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete regarding crucial details like specific evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, which are essential for a comprehensive bid submission.

Full document access and disclosed value contribute positively to fairness. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and objectivity in the assessment process. Additionally, the lack of e-submission can create barriers to equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the absence of electronic submission ('No e-submission') is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. The estimated value in EUR and GBP is also consistent. Minor inconsistencies include missing 'Liable Person' and unpopulated procedure codes.

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This indicates a significant oversight in integrating modern sustainability and responsible procurement practices.