Tenders

715755459 LSP Flapjack UK 4 Tender Notice

Open
Deadline
24 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017502-2026
Value
£675,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£675,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Authority has a requirement for the provision of services for the design and production of the BBMF Lancaster aircraft hydraulic flapjack part, quantity two. One hydraulic flapjack must be provided by November 2026, and the second by June 2027.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements listed in the provided text.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds listed in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements listed in the provided text.]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Supplier must be compliant with the technical requirements set out in the ITT.
--Design and production of the BBMF Lancaster aircraft hydraulic flapjack part, quantity two.
--Delivery of one hydraulic flapjack by November 2026.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 675000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for aircraft repair services is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, and does not explicitly address sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract start date. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact procedural fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services, including the core work and optional elements, is clear. Technical requirements are referenced in the ITT, implying detailed documentation is available. Delivery timelines are specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are not detailed in the provided text, and submission requirements are also missing.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements appear objective and focused on technical capability. The main concern is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias if not clearly defined in the ITT.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The absence of information regarding e-submission is a drawback, and the availability of document content is not confirmed.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the assessment of sustainability integration.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical requirements
Disclosed estimated value
Open procedure
Specific delivery timelines

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability focus
Unclear submission process (e-submission not specified)
No document content available

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria within the ITT.
2. Specify the e-submission process and ensure document content is accessible.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline