Latgale, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 11, 2026 at 11:00
Other
164037
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender documentation is generally clear and well-structured, but its fairness and practicality are significantly undermined by restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value.
Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined. No disputes are reported. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern that could impede legal compliance if bidders cannot fully review the terms.
The tender description and requirements are clear and unambiguous. Evaluation criteria ('lowest price without VAT') are explicitly stated, contradicting an automated flag. Performance conditions refer to the technical specification and contract draft, which is standard.
Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, and key documents are listed. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the estimated contract value is not disclosed, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the summary.
The procedure is open, and evaluation criteria are objective. Deadlines are reasonable, and requirements appear generic. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a critical concern, and the undisclosed estimated value significantly reduces transparency and fairness for bidders.
E-Procurement is indicated and electronic submission is likely supported. Contract duration is clear. However, a specific contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent due to the undisclosed value. The document access flag could also pose practical challenges.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are inconsistencies regarding 'E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission' and the evaluation criteria flag. The 'Required: No' status for a critical technical specification document is also inconsistent.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement aspects, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes