Maintenance of young trees and formation of woody plants in Ventspils state city

This tender is generally clear and well-structured, but its transparency and fairness are significantly reduced by restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, clearly defining the procedure type and CPV code, with no reported disputes. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full transparency and equal access to information, which are fundamental legal principles.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable, covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Evaluation criteria ('lowest price') are explicitly stated for each part.

All essential basic information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, duration, location) is provided. All 6 tender documents are listed and summarized. The main deficiency is the undisclosed estimated value, which reduces overall completeness and transparency.

The tender uses an open procedure and specifies objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. E-procurement is indicated, promoting equal access. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the undisclosed estimated value significantly hinder fairness by creating potential barriers and information asymmetry for bidders.

The tender specifies an 8-month contract duration and indicates E-Procurement, suggesting electronic submission is supported. However, the lack of an explicit document URL and contract start date are minor practical inconveniences.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are notable inconsistencies. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic contradicts the 'No e-submission' automated check, and 'Documents available' contradicts 'Restricted document access'. The estimated value is also missing.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.