Framework Agreement for full technical provision of events

This tender demonstrates good procedural structure and clear requirements for technical event support, but transparency is significantly hampered by the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice. Potential issues with document access and the absence of sustainability considerations also warrant attention.

The tender follows an open procedure with reasonable submission deadlines and a clearly defined CPV code. No disputes are reported. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the flag for 'Restricted document access' (if true for the original portal) represent potential compliance risks. While 'selection criteria' are mentioned in detailed requirements, their explicit specification in the main notice is lacking, which could be a compliance concern regarding transparency.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-structured, referring to specific parts of the procurement documents. Performance conditions are clearly linked to the technical specification and draft contract. The main concern for clarity is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria in the main tender overview, despite 'selection criteria' being mentioned in the detailed requirements.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration, is provided. All relevant tender documents are listed and summarized. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the explicit evaluation criteria are not fully detailed in the main tender overview, impacting overall completeness.

The tender benefits from being an open procedure with e-procurement enabled and reasonable deadlines. However, the undisclosed estimated value significantly reduces transparency and makes it difficult for bidders to assess the opportunity fairly. The lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main notice and the flagged 'Restricted document access' (if applicable to the original portal) further diminish fairness and equal access.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality for bidders. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, a specific contract start date is not provided, and detailed financing information is absent, which are minor practical limitations.

The tender data is largely consistent, with key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The characteristic 'E-Procurement' is explicitly stated, overriding the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.