Author supervision for the object "Reconstruction of Mehanizatoru Street in Preiļi"

This tender for author supervision services is well-structured with clear requirements, but its transparency and fairness are significantly undermined by restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender generally adheres to standard procurement procedures, being an open, EU-funded process with a reasonable deadline and correct CPV classification. However, restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value present transparency issues that could challenge full compliance with EU procurement principles.

The project description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and comprehensive. Document summaries indicate that detailed technical specifications and evaluation criteria are available within the tender documents, suggesting good clarity of content, assuming access.

Most essential information, including title, organization, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Requirements and criteria are indicated as defined in the documents. However, the undisclosed estimated value and restricted document access significantly reduce the overall completeness of information readily available to bidders.

The fairness of this tender is severely compromised by the restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value. While the requirements themselves do not appear tailored, these fundamental transparency issues create an uneven playing field for potential bidders. E-procurement is stated, but access restrictions contradict its benefit.

The tender supports e-procurement and clearly specifies the contract duration. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and the significant hurdle of restricted document access reduce the practicality for bidders to easily engage with and prepare a submission.

Most core data fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. There are minor inconsistencies between automated flags (e.g., "no evaluation criteria," "no e-submission") and the detailed content summaries/characteristics, which suggests some internal data parsing issues. The estimated value is a missing key field.

The tender is EU-funded, which generally implies higher standards. However, the automated checks indicate a lack of specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria within the tender requirements, representing a missed opportunity for sustainable procurement practices.