United Kingdom22 days leftOpen

Housekeeping Services

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

£240,000

DEADLINE

February 24, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

98341110

REFERENCE

007735-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

This contract is for a supplier to deliver housekeeping services to 4 trust sites
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were identified from the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific eligibility requirements were identified from the provided information.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The supplier must be capable of delivering housekeeping services to four Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust sites.
  • The supplier must be prepared to deliver services for a contract duration of 24 months.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include a cost proposal, as cost accounts for 35% of the evaluation criteria.
  • The proposed cost should align with the estimated contract value of approximately £200,000 / €240,000 over 24 months.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-02-24T12:00:00+00:00.
  • Bidders must participate in an Open Procurement process.
  • The bid must address quality aspects, as quality accounts for 65% of the evaluation criteria.
  • The bid must address cost aspects, as cost accounts for 35% of the evaluation criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data007735-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data about the tender for housekeeping services at four Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust sites, including buyer details and the tender's initiation.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data007735-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the tender for housekeeping services at four Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust sites, including buyer information and tender initiation details.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents007735-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This tender notice from Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust invites bids for housekeeping services across four trust sites, valued at £200,000, with submissions due by 24 February 2026, and evaluation based on 65% quality and 35% cost.
HTM
Tender Notice
General Information007735-2026.html
Summary:
This tender notice outlines an open procurement for housekeeping services across four Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust sites, with an estimated value of £200,000 and a submission deadline of 24 February 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for housekeeping services demonstrates good basic information and transparency through OCDS data, but is significantly hampered by a lack of detailed requirements, missing electronic submission, and no focus on sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and there are no disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, and the AI could not identify specific mandatory exclusion grounds, which are minor disclosure gaps. The 27-day submission period from today is reasonable.

Missing reveal date
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds identified
Clarity60/100

While the service description is clear, the tender lacks detailed technical specifications, performance conditions, and a breakdown of the 65% quality evaluation criteria. This makes it difficult for bidders to understand the exact expectations and prepare comprehensive bids.

Lack of detailed technical specifications
No breakdown of quality evaluation criteria (65%)
Completeness70/100

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are complete, and all documents are available. However, detailed requirements for eligibility, mandatory exclusion grounds, and the sub-criteria for quality evaluation are either missing or not sufficiently detailed.

Missing detailed eligibility and mandatory exclusion grounds
Lack of detailed sub-criteria for quality evaluation
Fairness65/100

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements are generic, preventing tailoring. However, the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria reduces transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission is a significant barrier to equal access and fair competition.

Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
No e-submission support
Practicality60/100

The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the critical absence of electronic submission capabilities significantly hinders the practicality and efficiency of the bidding process for potential suppliers.

No e-submission support
Data Consistency80/100

Key dates are logical, and the status is active with no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field, but these do not impact the overall integrity significantly.

Missing codes for procedure type
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, nor is it identified as EU-funded, indicating a missed opportunity for incorporating sustainable procurement practices.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, organization, value, duration)
Procedure type and CPV code are correctly assigned
All tender documents are available and summarized
Open procedure ensures broad participation
Use of OCDS data indicates transparency efforts

Concerns

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for quality (65% weight)
Absence of electronic submission (e-submission)
Missing specific eligibility and mandatory exclusion grounds
No focus on sustainability (green, social, innovation aspects)
Requirements are very generic, lacking detailed specifications

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed sub-criteria for the 65% quality evaluation to ensure transparency and objectivity.
2. Implement an e-submission platform to enhance fairness, accessibility, and efficiency.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into the tender requirements and evaluation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
65/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes