Dynamic Purchasing System for the Provision of Passenger Transport

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for passenger transport but suffers from a critical lack of detailed documentation and specific qualification criteria for initial admission, hindering transparency and fair competition.

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally sound procurement procedure. The mention of mandatory exclusion grounds is appropriate. However, the absence of specific details for these grounds and other qualification criteria raises concerns about transparency and proportionality in practice.

The overall purpose and two-stage nature of the DPS are clearly described. However, the specific requirements for initial admission regarding technical capability and financial standing are excessively vague, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand what is truly required for qualification.

The tender information is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential details such as full DPS rules, application forms, detailed qualification criteria, and evaluation methodologies are missing, making it impossible for bidders to submit a compliant application.

The lack of specific, objective, and transparent qualification and evaluation criteria for DPS admission creates a significant risk of subjective assessment. This could undermine fair competition and equal treatment among economic operators seeking to join the system.

Without any tender documents or detailed requirements, it is practically impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant application to join the DPS. This significantly impedes market participation.

There is an inconsistency regarding financial requirements, stating they 'will be detailed for initial DPS qualification and/or individual Service Contracts,' yet they are not detailed in the provided information for initial qualification.

The tender does not specify any green, social, or innovation-focused procurement characteristics or criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage public spending for broader societal and environmental benefits.