Legal Compliance50/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a specified reveal date and, more critically, the complete lack of evaluation criteria are significant breaches of transparency and compliance with procurement regulations.
•Missing reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity55/100
The tender description is very clear, detailed, and unambiguous about the services required and the target beneficiaries. The AI-extracted technical requirements are also well-articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines the overall clarity for potential bidders regarding how their submission will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
The tender provides essential basic information, financial details, and a clear timeline. Documents are listed as available. However, it is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria. Minor gaps include the missing 'Liable Person' and specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Liable Person missing
Fairness45/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements, as extracted, appear generic and not tailored. However, fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, preventing objective and transparent assessment. The lack of electronic submission also creates an unnecessary barrier, hindering equal access for all potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided.
•No e-submission
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field, missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', and the absence of a 'reveal date'.
•Liable Person missing
•Type/Procedure codes missing
Sustainability70/100
This tender has a very strong inherent social dimension, as its core purpose is to provide resettlement services for refugees, focusing on integration and access to essential services. However, it explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement aspects or innovation.
•Not green procurement
•No innovation focus