Legal Compliance75/100
As a planning notice, the tender provides sufficient information for market engagement. However, the absence of a defined procedure type, explicit mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds, and formal evaluation criteria would be significant legal compliance issues if this were a formal tender. For its current 'planning' status, it is moderately compliant.
•Type: None
•Procedure: None
Clarity80/100
The tender description is exceptionally clear, detailing the project's purpose, scope, required expertise, and division into lots. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-articulated. The inclusion of discussion areas for market engagement further enhances clarity. The only missing element is the formal evaluation criteria, which is typical for a preliminary market engagement.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
The tender provides all essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, description, CPV code, NUTS code, and contract duration/start date. Multiple supporting documents are referenced. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and formal evaluation criteria are absent, which are significant omissions for a complete tender package, even if understandable for a planning notice.
•Estimated Value: Not disclosed
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness65/100
The tender offers full document access and reasonable time for market engagement. The division into four lots promotes broader participation. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly reduce transparency and make it difficult for potential bidders to assess the opportunity fairly or understand how their future proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access. The requirements are specialized but do not appear tailored to a specific company.
•Value not disclosed
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100
Key practical details such as contract start date, duration, and document URLs for background research are provided. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. The undisclosed value also makes practical planning difficult for potential suppliers.
•No e-submission
•Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100
The information provided is largely consistent and logical. Dates are coherent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. While some fields like 'Type' and 'Procedure' are unpopulated, this is consistent with its 'planning' status rather than an inconsistency in existing data.
•Type: None
•Procedure: None
Sustainability50/100
The tender demonstrates a strong focus on innovation, aiming to enhance crime statistics collection through new online survey methodologies and piloting redesigned modules. This aligns with the innovation aspect of sustainable procurement. However, it explicitly lacks any stated green procurement criteria or broader social considerations for supplier selection, beyond the inclusivity of the survey itself.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria