Supported Internship - Oxfordshire

This tender clearly outlines a vital social service but is significantly hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission, which critically undermine fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria represents a compliance gap for a public tender, even below threshold.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. The mention of 'Divided into Parts' is also not elaborated.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds significantly impacts completeness. The summaries of attached documents are brief and repetitive, suggesting a lack of a comprehensive tender document pack.

The complete absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission are critical issues that severely undermine fairness and transparency. While the requirements do not appear tailored, these procedural deficiencies create an uneven playing field.

Key practical details like contract start date, duration, and financing information are available. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' and procedure 'Code' fields are empty, and the statement 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

The tender's core purpose, supporting learners with EHCPs into employment, represents a strong social sustainability aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, innovation focus, or EU funding.