Two-level Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing on National Main Road A1 Riga (Baltezers) - Estonian Border (Ainaži) near Medzābaki

This tender is well-described with detailed technical requirements, but its transparency and fairness are significantly undermined by restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the 'restricted document access' for an open, EU-funded, WTO/GPA tender raise significant concerns regarding compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles mandated by EU and national procurement regulations.

The project description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements, supported by multiple detailed documents, appear comprehensive and well-structured. Evaluation criteria ('lowest price or cost') are explicitly stated.

While basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided, the estimated value is not disclosed. More significantly, the 'restricted document access' means that despite the listing of 5 documents, their full content is not readily available, which severely impacts the completeness of information for potential bidders.

The tender suffers from critical fairness issues due to 'restricted document access' and the undisclosed estimated value, which hinder equal access to information and transparency. While the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective and e-procurement is supported, these fundamental transparency failures significantly undermine fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive practical aspect. However, the 'restricted document access' creates a significant practical barrier for bidders. The contract start date is not specified, only the duration.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are inconsistencies. The estimated value is 'Not disclosed' but 'Value Classified: No,' which is contradictory. The 'Over Sum Limit: No' for an EU-funded, WTO/GPA works tender also raises questions.

The project itself, a two-level pedestrian and bicycle crossing, inherently contributes to sustainable transport, road safety, and environmental accessibility, aligning with the EU funding program's objectives. While explicit, detailed green procurement, social clauses, or innovation criteria are not highlighted in the summaries, the nature of the investment is positive for sustainability.