Tenders

LSO & ESU Services for LBWF Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Open
Deadline
5 days left
March 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013353-2026
Value
£150,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£150,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
55
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Local Site Operator (LSO) and Equipment Support Unit (ESU) services for the London Borough of Waltham Forest’s Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 2 categories

Submission (4)
Technical (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted through the ProContract procurement portal.
--New users must register on the ProContract procurement portal to submit a bid.
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-08 at 17:00:00 UTC.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be capable of providing Local Site Operator (LSO) services for air quality monitoring stations.
--The bidder must be capable of providing Equipment Support Unit (ESU) services for air quality monitoring stations.
--The bidder should possess expertise in air quality management.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document provides instructions for logging into the ProContract procurement portal, including registration for new users, password resets for migrated accounts, and details on cookie policy and help resources.

OCDS RecordDOC
013353-2026_ocds_record.json

This tender seeks Local Site Operator (LSO) and Equipment Support Unit (ESU) services for air quality monitoring stations in the London Borough of Waltham Forest.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013353-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the London Borough of Waltham Forest's tender for Local Site Operator and Equipment Support Unit services for its Air Quality Monitoring Stations.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013353-2026_official.pdf

This document is a contract award notice from NHS England for the use of a dental skills lab at Milton Keynes Education Centre, detailing the supplier, contract value, and dates for a service already procured without competition.

Tender NoticeHTM
013353-2026.html

This tender notice invites bids for Local Site Operator (LSO) and Equipment Support Unit (ESU) services for the London Borough of Waltham Forest’s Air Quality Monitoring Stations, with an estimated value of £125,000 and a submission deadline of 8 March 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

55
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides clear basic information and service requirements but suffers from critical deficiencies in transparency and document management. The absence of evaluation criteria and the inclusion of an irrelevant document are significant flaws that undermine the quality and fairness of the procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 3) is a major issue, suggesting poor document control. The missing tender reveal date is a minor procedural gap, though the 23-day submission period is acceptable for a below-threshold tender. Procedure type and CPV are clear.

Irrelevant document linked (Document 3)
Missing tender reveal date
Clarity55/100

The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness50/100

While basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the missing evaluation criteria. Furthermore, the presence of an irrelevant document (Document 3) raises concerns about the integrity and completeness of the overall document set.

Missing evaluation criteria
Irrelevant document linked (Document 3)
Fairness50/100

The tender discloses value, supports e-procurement, and its requirements appear generic. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively prepare or assess their chances.

No evaluation criteria specified
Irrelevant document linked (Document 3)
Practicality85/100

The tender scores well on practicality, with clear electronic submission instructions, a specified contract start date, duration, and estimated value. Document access is implied via the ProContract portal.

Data Consistency40/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the inclusion of a completely unrelated contract award notice (Document 3) as an 'Official PDF Version' is a severe data inconsistency. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and 'Type Code' are also empty.

Irrelevant document linked (Document 3)
'Liable Person' field empty
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services required
Electronic submission via a portal is supported
Key financial and timeline details are provided
Requirements for LSO/ESU services are clearly stated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria, severely impacting transparency and fairness
Inclusion of an irrelevant document (Document 3) indicating poor document management
Missing tender reveal date, hindering full transparency of the tender period
Lack of sustainability (green, social, innovation) focus

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Rectify the document links, removing the irrelevant NHS England document and ensuring all relevant tender documents are correctly attached.
3. Provide the tender reveal date for full transparency regarding the tender period.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline