United Kingdom4 days leftOpen

Children's Bikes

Tender Overview

LOCATION

North East England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£84,000

DEADLINE

February 06, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

34430000

REFERENCE

006431-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Purchase of 24" children's bikes to be delivered to primary schools across the City of Sunderland.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidder must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per public procurement regulations (e.g., bankruptcy, serious professional misconduct, tax evasion).

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must be legally constituted and authorized to conduct business.
  • Bidder must be capable of delivering goods within the United Kingdom, specifically to the City of Sunderland.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must be able to supply 24" children's bikes.
  • Bidder must be capable of delivering the bikes to primary schools across the City of Sunderland.
  • Bikes supplied must comply with relevant safety standards for children's bicycles.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to fulfill a contract valued at approximately 84,000 EUR.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid no later than 2026-02-06T12:00:00+00:00.
  • The bid must propose the supply of 24" children's bikes.
  • The bid must include delivery to primary schools across the City of Sunderland.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
Data006431-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006431-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Sunderland City Council's tender for 24" children's bikes, including buyer information and the legal basis for the procurement.
PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF006431-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available
HTM
Tender Notice
Notice006431-2026.html
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for children's bikes presents a clear description and requirements but suffers from significant deficiencies in completeness and fairness due to missing evaluation criteria and inaccessible tender documents. While basic information is present, critical elements for a transparent and competitive process are lacking.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender defines the procedure type and correctly assigns the CPV code. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the missing reveal date are significant legal compliance issues. Furthermore, the failure to access critical tender documents hinders mandatory disclosure requirements.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the goods and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the overall clarity of the procurement process is severely hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, leaving bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is provided, the tender is critically incomplete. The liable person is missing, procedure codes are absent, and most importantly, evaluation criteria are not defined, and the majority of the attached documents are inaccessible.

Liable person missing
Type and Procedure codes missing
Fairness50/100

Fairness is significantly compromised by the lack of full document access and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids. The lack of an e-submission option also presents a barrier to equal access, although the requirements themselves do not appear tailored.

No full document access (3 out of 4 documents failed to download)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender provides essential practical details like contract start date, duration, and estimated value. However, the lack of electronic submission support and the inability to access most tender documents significantly reduce the practicality for potential bidders to prepare and submit a comprehensive offer.

No e-submission
Failed document downloads
Data Consistency80/100

The provided dates for submission, contract start, and duration are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, some key fields, such as the liable person and specific procedure codes, are unpopulated, and the reveal date is missing, indicating minor data gaps.

Liable person missing
Type and Procedure codes missing
Sustainability35/100

The tender does not incorporate any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives within this procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of goods and delivery location
Specific technical and financial requirements are outlined
Estimated value, contract duration, and start date are provided
CPV code is correctly assigned
Tender is divided into parts, potentially allowing for more flexibility

Concerns

Critical tender documents are inaccessible (3 out of 4 failed to download)
No evaluation criteria are specified, severely impacting transparency and fairness
Lack of electronic submission option
Missing key administrative details (liable person, procedure codes, reveal date)
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and functional for potential bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance practicality and equal access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
62/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes