Legal Compliance55/100
The tender lacks explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement. The procedure codes are missing, and the 'Tender Notice' document failed to download, indicating potential access issues. The reveal date is also missing, preventing assessment of the 7-day rule.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated
•No specific eligibility requirements explicitly stated
Clarity60/100
The technical description of the refurbishment works is highly detailed and unambiguous. However, the overall clarity is severely hampered by the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, and the lack of specified eligibility, financial, and mandatory exclusion requirements.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No specific eligibility requirements explicitly stated
Completeness50/100
While basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements. The failure to download the 'Tender Notice' also points to incompleteness of accessible documentation.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated
Fairness55/100
The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand how their submissions will be judged. The lack of e-submission capabilities and the failed document download also limit equal access and participation. Technical requirements do not appear tailored.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission supported
Practicality60/100
The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The failed download of the 'Tender Notice' document also presents a practical barrier to accessing full tender details. However, the contract start date and duration are clearly specified.
•No e-submission supported
•Tender Notice document download failed
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the procedure type. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.
•Liable Person field is empty
•Missing codes for procedure type
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria