NCC1228 - Concordia Leisure Centre Lift Replacement (Re-Tender)

This tender provides a clear project description and includes environmental considerations, but it is hampered by missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, inconsistent financial value reporting, a failed document download, and the lack of electronic submission, impacting its overall quality.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and no disputes are noted. However, a significant omission is the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which is critical for compliance with national procurement regulations. The missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue.

The project description and technical requirements are clear and understandable. While evaluation criteria (60% price, 40% quality) are present in one document summary, their limited visibility across the tender package reduces overall clarity. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds also impacts clarity for bidders.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. However, one of the four listed documents failed to download, which is a significant completeness issue. Details regarding the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic are also missing, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are not provided.

The lack of electronic submission support and the failed download of a tender document are significant fairness concerns, potentially creating unequal access. While evaluation criteria are objective, their limited visibility reduces transparency. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

The absence of electronic submission support is a critical practicality drawback in modern procurement. The failed download of one document also suggests potential practical issues for bidders accessing full information.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the estimated value, stated as 92,400.00 EUR in basic information but £77,000 in document summaries. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender explicitly includes environmental considerations for sourcing materials and plant, which is a positive aspect of green procurement. However, it lacks explicit social aspects or a focus on innovation.