MOT Garage Refurbishment

This tender for MOT garage refurbishment exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance and completeness due to missing critical requirements, despite clear basic information and support for e-submission.

The tender lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement. While the procedure type and CPV codes are correctly defined, these omissions represent a high-severity legal risk.

The project description is clear, and the overall evaluation criteria (70% quality, 30% price) are stated. However, the tender lacks detailed technical specifications, scope of works, and specific sub-criteria for 'quality' evaluation, making it difficult for bidders to formulate comprehensive and competitive proposals.

While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, the tender is critically incomplete. It is missing detailed technical specifications, a comprehensive scope of works, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and detailed quality evaluation criteria. The attached documents are primarily administrative, not core tender specifications.

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports e-procurement, promoting equal access. However, the absence of detailed eligibility requirements, exclusion grounds, and objective sub-criteria for the 70% 'quality' evaluation significantly compromises fairness and transparency, making it challenging for all bidders to compete on an equal footing.

The tender supports electronic submission via the ProContract portal, and key dates such as contract start and duration are clearly specified. The estimated value is also provided, contributing to good practicality.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there is a significant contradiction between the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic and the description of a 'single stage tender' with a 'lump fixed price' for the entire works.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.