Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a DPS is generally compliant with procurement regulations for flexible, ongoing procurement. However, the initial notice defers critical legal information, such as mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria, to an application pack, which is not immediately accessible.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not immediately available
•Detailed evaluation criteria for joining the DPS not provided upfront
Clarity40/100
The tender clearly outlines the purpose, challenges, and benefits of establishing the DPS. However, the specific requirements for joining the DPS are high-level, with crucial details deferred to a separate application pack, impacting immediate clarity for potential bidders.
•Specific eligibility and financial requirements are not detailed in the initial notice
•Evaluation methodology for joining the DPS is not clear
Completeness75/100
The initial tender notice is significantly incomplete, lacking essential documents and detailed information. Key elements like full mandatory exclusion grounds, comprehensive eligibility and financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are deferred to an application pack that must be requested.
•No documents attached to the tender notice
•Mandatory exclusion grounds are not fully specified
Fairness80/100
The requirement to email for an application pack creates a slight barrier to entry and could lead to inconsistencies in information dissemination. While the requirements for competitive rates, integration, and IP retention are stringent, they appear to be driven by the contracting authority's operational needs rather than tailoring for a specific company.
•Requirement to email for application pack may create an unnecessary barrier to entry
Practicality20/100
The choice of a Dynamic Purchasing System is highly practical for addressing the stated needs of short lead times, dynamic project scopes, and the continuous need for a validated pool of external support. The requirements for quick response and integration are also practical for the client's operational model.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the tender notice is internally consistent, with the description aligning with the extracted requirements. The automated checks regarding missing documents are consistent with the stated process of requesting an application pack.
Sustainability25/100
The tender notice does not include any explicit environmental, social, or ethical considerations. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process, especially given the nature of the contracting authority.
•Absence of green procurement criteria
•Absence of social criteria