Commuter Travel Patterns and Planning

This tender presents significant data inconsistencies, particularly regarding submission deadlines and estimated value, alongside critical omissions of evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, severely impacting its clarity, fairness, and legal compliance.

The tender lacks specified mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for legal compliance. Furthermore, the conflicting submission deadlines across various documents introduce legal uncertainty.

Clarity is severely hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria and the conflicting submission deadlines. The mention of the tender being 'Divided into Parts' without further explanation also adds ambiguity.

While basic tender information is present, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and comprehensive financial requirements beyond the estimated value.

The complete lack of specified evaluation criteria is a critical fairness issue, as it prevents potential suppliers from understanding how their bids will be objectively assessed, thus compromising transparency and equal treatment.

The tender supports electronic submission and clearly states the contract duration and start date, which are practical aspects. However, an explicit document URL is not provided, though implied by the e-tendering system.

Data consistency is critically poor due to significant discrepancies in the submission deadline (16 February vs. 27 February) and the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP figures) across different sections and documents.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability in the procurement process.