Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally compliant procurement procedure, designed to be flexible and open for continuous applications. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and specific award criteria in the provided summary raises concerns about full compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles without the full documentation.
Clarity40/100
The overall purpose and structure of the DPS, including product categories, are clearly described. However, the specific mandatory criteria for acceptance, detailed technical specifications, and financial requirements are not clear from the provided text, leading to ambiguity for potential applicants.
Completeness83/100
This is the primary weakness. The tender information is severely incomplete due to the explicit absence of any attached documents. Critical details such as full mandatory exclusion grounds, specific eligibility criteria, detailed technical specifications, financial requirements, and crucially, the evaluation/award criteria for the DPS are entirely missing.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure inherently promotes fairness by allowing continuous applications and potentially accommodating a wider range of suppliers over time. However, the lack of detailed, transparent criteria (eligibility, technical, financial, award) in the provided summary makes it impossible to assess if the actual award process is fair and non-discriminatory. There is no indication of requirements being tailored for a specific company, but the lack of detail prevents a full assessment.
Practicality40/100
The general requirements for supplying fresh food products seem practical. However, without detailed specifications, quality standards, delivery terms, and logistical requirements, it is impossible to fully assess the operational practicality and potential challenges for bidders.
Data Consistency100/100
Within the provided text, the information is consistent and free from contradictions.
Sustainability0/100
No sustainability, green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are mentioned or implied in the provided text. This represents a missed opportunity for a large-scale public procurement contract to drive positive environmental and social impact.