Tenders

Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013926-2026
Value
£287,601
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 18, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£287,601
Duration
12 months
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Other
57
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Provision of a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit bids by the deadline: March 18, 2026, 00:00:00.
--Submit bids via the Oxford City Council's e-tendering portal.
--Provide a quality proposal that will be evaluated for 70% of the total score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are mentioned in the provided summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Demonstrate capability to provide a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial ratios) are mentioned in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
013926-2026_ocds_record.json

This document is an Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) record providing machine-readable metadata about the Oxford City Council's tender for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013926-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the Oxford City Council's tender for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, including buyer information and legal basis.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013926-2026_official.pdf

Oxford City Council seeks bids for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, valued at £287,601, with submissions due by March 18, 2026, via their e-tendering portal, evaluated 70% on quality and 30% on price.

Tender NoticeHTM
013926-2026.html

This tender notice from Oxford City Council invites bids for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, detailing submission deadlines, an estimated contract value of £287,601, and award criteria of 70% quality and 30% price.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

57
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender exhibits moderate quality, providing clear basic information and supporting e-submission, but suffers from significant gaps in detailed requirements and internal data inconsistencies.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The tender clearly defines the open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the AI-extracted summaries indicate a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summaries
Missing specific eligibility requirements in summaries
Clarity55/100

The service description is clear, and the overall evaluation weighting (70% quality, 30% price) is stated in document summaries. However, the AI-extracted requirements are vague, lacking detailed technical, financial, and sub-criteria for the 'quality' component, hindering bidder understanding.

Vague technical capability requirements
Lack of detailed quality evaluation sub-criteria
Completeness60/100

Basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, and documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender summaries are incomplete regarding specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial, and detailed technical requirements, which are crucial for a comprehensive bid.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summaries
Missing specific eligibility requirements in summaries
Fairness50/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports e-submission. However, the absence of detailed eligibility, financial, and specific quality sub-criteria for evaluation creates a significant risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining transparency and equal treatment for bidders.

Lack of detailed eligibility requirements
Lack of detailed financial requirements
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are specified. While the overall framework for submission is practical, the lack of detailed requirements may complicate the practical preparation of a comprehensive and competitive bid.

Lack of detailed requirements complicates bid preparation
Data Consistency40/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant contradictions within the provided information, specifically regarding the presence of evaluation criteria and e-submission capabilities, which reduces overall data reliability.

Contradiction on evaluation criteria
Contradiction on e-submission
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria beyond the inherent nature of the service, or innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear service title and description
Basic tender information (value, duration, CPV, NUTS) is well-defined
Open procedure and e-submission portal specified
OCDS data provided, indicating transparency efforts

Concerns

Significant lack of detailed requirements (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial, detailed technical)
Vague 'quality' evaluation criteria (70% weighting) without sub-criteria
Contradictions within the provided information regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria for the procurement process

Recommendations

1. Clearly articulate all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, financial, and detailed technical requirements.
2. Provide comprehensive and objective sub-criteria for the 'quality' evaluation component.
3. Resolve internal contradictions within the tender information to enhance reliability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline