Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clear, and no disputes are noted. However, the missing reveal date and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance issues impacting transparency and fairness.
•Missing reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100
The role description and technical requirements are very clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity deficit for bidders, as they cannot understand how their submission will be judged.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Requirements are listed, but the critical missing piece is the evaluation criteria. While documents are listed, their summaries suggest redundancy rather than a full suite of distinct, comprehensive tender documents.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of distinct, comprehensive tender documents beyond basic description
Fairness60/100
The disclosed value and generally reasonable preparation time are positive. However, the missing evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as is the lack of e-submission, which undermines transparency and equal access. Requirements are specific but not overtly tailored.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The contract start date, duration, and financing information are clear. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical hurdle in modern procurement, making the process less efficient and accessible.
Data Consistency90/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. Most key fields are populated, with only minor omissions like 'Liable Person' and specific codes for Type/Procedure.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•Missing specific codes for Type/Procedure
Sustainability50/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender documentation. It is not indicated as EU funded.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria