Construction of a pedestrian and bicycle path along the national local road V1308 Ventspils – Avotiņi in the section from 2.929 km to 4.950 km (from Ventspils – Cirpstenei)

This tender for a pedestrian and bicycle path construction demonstrates good project clarity and inherent sustainability, benefiting from EU funding. However, critical concerns regarding restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value significantly undermine legal compliance, fairness, and practicality for potential bidders.

While the procedure type, CPV codes, and deadlines are reasonable, the 'Restricted document access' flag represents a severe legal compliance issue, as bidders must have full access to all tender documents. The non-disclosure of the estimated value is a minor transparency concern.

The project description, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are clearly stated. However, the potential for restricted access to full tender documents could ultimately hinder a bidder's comprehensive understanding and clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and financing details are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests that the full tender package may not be completely available to bidders, impacting overall completeness.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, as it prevents equal access to essential information for all potential bidders. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also reduces transparency. While evaluation criteria are objective, this fundamental flaw severely impacts fairness.

The 'Restricted document access' and the absence of explicit document URLs make it highly impractical for bidders to prepare and submit a comprehensive proposal. While e-procurement is indicated, the overall practical execution is severely hampered by document accessibility issues.

Dates and status are consistent, but there are significant contradictions between automated checks and the provided tender information, particularly regarding 'Restricted document access' versus AI summaries, and 'No e-submission' versus 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The most critical inconsistency is the accessibility of documents.

The project involves the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle path, which inherently promotes sustainable transport and aligns with green procurement principles. Its EU funding also suggests adherence to higher environmental standards, despite the lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.