Legal Compliance70/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the missing reveal date are significant compliance shortcomings. The mandatory pre-qualification is permissible if justified by the service nature.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing tender reveal date
Clarity55/100
The description of the service and the council's needs is very clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed performance conditions make it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged or what specific outcomes are expected.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of detailed performance conditions
Completeness65/100
Basic information, financial details, and timeline are well-specified. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed technical specifications beyond the general service description. One of the listed documents also failed to download.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of detailed technical specifications
Fairness40/100
The absence of evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as bidders cannot understand the basis of assessment. The mandatory requirement for bidders to be already registered with the Bikeability Trust, while potentially justified for quality, significantly restricts competition. The reported lack of e-submission also impacts equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified (critical for fairness)
•Mandatory pre-qualification (Bikeability Trust registration) restricts competition
Practicality60/100
A document URL, contract start date, and clear duration are provided, which are practical elements. However, the reported lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
•No electronic submission reported
Data Consistency85/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated, though minor details like the 'Liable Person' and 'Type Code' are missing, along with the reveal date.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•Missing 'Type Code'
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria (beyond the inherent social benefit of the service itself), or innovation focus in its requirements or evaluation. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria (beyond core service)