RDC CS Barnhorn Green Employers Agent and Quantity Surveyor (ESPH728)

This tender provides a clear project description and essential financial details, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, which impacts legal compliance, clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, undermining transparency and fair competition principles. The missing reveal date is also a minor disclosure gap.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. Nevertheless, the fundamental absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for potential bidders to clearly understand how their proposals will be assessed, severely impacting the tender's overall clarity.

The tender includes most basic information, such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, and all listed documents are available. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria represents a major gap in the tender's completeness, hindering comprehensive bid preparation.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides access to documents, which are positive for fairness. However, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and fairness of the procurement process. The absence of electronic submission also creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender provides clear information on the contract start date, duration, and financing. A significant practical drawback is the lack of support for electronic submission, which is a standard expectation for modern procurement processes and can increase administrative burden for bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency regarding dates and the absence of disputes. Minor gaps exist, such as the unspecified "Liable Person" and the missing reveal date, but these do not lead to contradictions or inconsistencies in the provided data.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it is part-funded by a national government fund, there is no indication of specific sustainability criteria being integrated into the procurement process.