Young stand tending services for the needs of Jēkabpils Municipality

This tender for young stand maintenance services is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but suffers from a lack of financial transparency and missing key contract details, alongside some minor data inconsistencies.

The tender provides a reasonable submission period (15 days), clearly defines the open procedure type, and assigns an appropriate CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced, indicating adherence to legal frameworks. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if implying non-public availability without registration, presents a minor transparency concern but does not suggest a major legal breach.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission are well-documented. The summary of 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' explicitly states evaluation criteria based on the lowest price, which clarifies the evaluation method despite a conflicting flag.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, description, and location is provided. Deadlines are specified, and documents are listed. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for potential bidders.

The open procedure and enabled e-procurement support equal access for bidders. The deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The undisclosed estimated value and 'Restricted document access' are minor concerns for full transparency.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date and financing information are not available. The absence of a specified contract duration also impacts practicality for planning purposes.

Most key fields are populated, and the dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies exist between automated flags and document summaries regarding evaluation criteria and document access, but these are reconcilable.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement principles, social aspects, or an innovation focus. While common for basic services, this represents a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices within public procurement.