Great Torrington School - Provision of Outsourced Cleaning Service

This tender provides clear basic information and service scope but suffers from significant deficiencies in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness due to missing critical requirements and evaluation criteria. The absence of e-submission and sustainability focus are also notable drawbacks.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission period (34 days from today) is reasonable. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, which are fundamental legal requirements in public procurement, represents a significant compliance deficiency.

The service description is clear, and the technical requirements are understandable, referring to detailed specification documents. However, the critical omission of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly impacting clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and supporting documents are listed. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements beyond the estimated value.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable preparation period. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria undermines transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the absence of e-submission capabilities creates an unequal access barrier and reduces efficiency for bidders.

Key practical details like the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and populated key fields. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes, but these do not significantly impact the overall coherence.

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.