Rescue works for the grotto walls of Krāslava Castle Complex at Pils Street 6, Krāslava

This tender for grotto wall rescue works provides extensive technical detail but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and the critical absence of evaluation criteria, severely impacting fairness and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the critical issues of 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' represent significant non-compliance with fundamental public procurement principles of transparency and equal treatment.

The technical and financial requirements are exceptionally detailed and clear, referencing numerous specific documents and drawings. This provides excellent clarity on the scope of work. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical clarity failure, leaving bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be judged.

The tender provides comprehensive basic information, financial details, timeline, and a wealth of technical documentation. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender package incomplete, as this is a fundamental component for bidders to formulate competitive offers.

Fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access' and the complete absence of 'evaluation criteria'. While the detailed technical requirements appear project-specific rather than tailored to a single company, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria fundamentally undermines the objectivity and equal treatment of bidders.

E-Procurement is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a specified contract start date can create planning challenges for potential contractors. 'Restricted document access' also negatively impacts the practical ability of bidders to prepare their submissions.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' was noted but resolved by prioritizing the explicit characteristic.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves cultural heritage restoration, which has inherent long-term value, it lacks specific modern sustainability criteria or EU funding that often drive higher standards in these areas.