Sports complex and territory management services at Ādaži military base

This tender for sports complex and territory maintenance services demonstrates a structured approach with clear evaluation criteria, but is significantly hampered by the absence of full tender documents and highly restrictive access to technical specifications.

The tender outlines mandatory exclusion grounds and an open procedure, which aligns with standard procurement regulations. Stated adherence to Green Public Procurement (GPP) requirements is positive, though its practical implementation is unclear from the available information.

While the service description and evaluation method (100% lowest price) are clear, the overall clarity is severely compromised by the lack of full tender documents. The process for accessing restricted technical specifications (Pielikums Nr.3) is overly complex and opaque, requiring individual NDAs for each employee, which hinders a comprehensive understanding of the scope.

The tender information provided is incomplete, as indicated by 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available'. Only extracted requirements are present, making a full assessment of the tender's completeness impossible. Key technical specifications (Pielikums Nr.3) are restricted.

The requirement for individual Non-Disclosure Agreements (Pielikums Nr.14) for each employee to access technical specifications (Pielikums Nr.3) is highly restrictive and creates a significant barrier to entry. This process could disproportionately disadvantage smaller bidders or those unfamiliar with the specific security protocols, potentially limiting competition and raising concerns about tailoring the tender towards specific, pre-vetted companies. The 100% price evaluation, while transparent, may not ensure the best quality for complex facility management services.

Electronic submission via EIS e-tender system is practical. However, the cumbersome process of requesting restricted documents, involving specific employee details and original signed NDAs for each, is highly impractical and creates unnecessary administrative burden for potential bidders.

There is a notable inconsistency between the stated requirement for bidders to 'adhere to Green Public Procurement (GPP) requirements' and the automated check result flagging 'Not green procurement'. This suggests a lack of specific, measurable GPP criteria within the extracted requirements or the full tender documents.

While GPP adherence is mentioned as an eligibility requirement, the absence of specific GPP criteria in the extracted requirements and the automated check result 'Not green procurement' suggest that sustainability aspects may not be sufficiently integrated or detailed within the tender. Without the full documents, it's impossible to verify the depth of GPP implementation.