Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds (as indicated by AI-extracted requirements) and the missing tender reveal date are minor compliance issues.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing tender reveal date
Clarity60/100
The description of the required website maintenance and development services is clear and provides good context. However, the tender lacks explicit detailed requirements, performance conditions, and crucially, specified evaluation criteria, which significantly reduces overall clarity for bidders.
•Missing detailed requirements
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are well-provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete regarding detailed technical requirements, mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria, which are essential for a comprehensive bid.
•Missing detailed technical requirements
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness50/100
The tender promotes equal access through a dedicated e-procurement portal and discloses the estimated value. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the bidding process, making it difficult for suppliers to prepare competitive and relevant proposals.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality85/100
The tender provides clear instructions for accessing and submitting bids via the Atamis e-procurement portal, including support contacts and a user guide. Electronic submission is fully supported, and key dates and financial information are available.
Data Consistency80/100
The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include unpopulated fields for the liable person and missing codes for the procedure type.
•Liable Person field empty
•Missing procedure type codes
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not incorporate any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader public policy objectives through procurement.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria